W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-dev@w3.org > January to March 2007

RE: Responses to "Draft of charter for NextWebOnt (Proposed) Working Group"

From: John McClure <jmcclure@hypergrove.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:15:51 -0800
To: <public-owl-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <MGEEIEEKKOMOLNHJAHMKAEMEEDAA.jmcclure@hypergrove.com>
Some OWL/RDF/S useability issues have been mentioned -- could anyone plz
provide a link to more discussion about these?  I've got one to put into the
mix but I don't want to duplicate anyone's earlier comments.
  -----Original Message-----
  From: public-owl-dev-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-owl-dev-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Kendall Clark
  Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 2:03 PM
  To: Jim Hendler
  Cc: Uli Sattler; public-owl-dev@w3.org; Bijan Parsia
  Subject: Re: Responses to "Draft of charter for NextWebOnt (Proposed)
Working Group"

  On Jan 12, 2007, at 1:15 PM, Jim Hendler wrote:

    I would like to see one "OWL Ultralite" that is as close to RDFS as

  I'd be happy to look at the model theory or axiomatization of such a
beast, if it's available. Not having seen anything yet, it's hard to say
whether it's interesting, either practically or theoretically.

  While I disagree that the TFs are motivated by "theoretical aspects" only,
they have the virtue of having been written down and can be discussed

Received on Friday, 12 January 2007 22:15:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:58:14 UTC