W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-dev@w3.org > April to June 2007

Re: on owl:imports

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:19:12 +0100
Message-ID: <46725990.7000904@hpl.hp.com>
To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
CC: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, Owl Dev <public-owl-dev@w3.org>

Pat Hayes wrote:
> I agree. But I don't follow why you need this:


<> owl:imports <ex2.owl>.
<> owl:imports <ex3.owl>.

<eg:a> <eg:p> <eg:b> .

<eg:a> <eg:q> <eg:b> .

I believe a legal interpretation can have I(ex2.owl) = I(ex3.owl), (in 
fact these seem wholly unconstrained) and so ex1.owl does not 
necessarily have two owl:imports.

Using the named graphs extension to RDF semantics would fix this, for 
example, by requiring I(ex2.owl), I(ex3.owl) to be the two different 
singleton sets of triples listed. That extension, is, of course, 
designed to be compatible with OWL Full.


Hewlett-Packard Limited
registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Friday, 15 June 2007 09:19:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:58:15 UTC