W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-dev@w3.org > April to June 2007

annotation properties on restrictions

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:26:51 -0400
Message-Id: <D38A03D7-3C2E-4509-A877-9E184253C79A@gmail.com>
To: Pellet <Pellet-Users@lists.mindswap.org>, public-owl-dev@w3.org

If I give a name to an otherwise anonymous restriction, Pellet  
considers the resultant ontology OWL full. What's the reasoning  
behind this? How would the reasoning apply to the addition of  
properties, such as rdfs:comment, to the restriction?

Received on Friday, 20 April 2007 15:27:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:58:15 UTC