W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-dev@w3.org > April to June 2007

Re: RDFS compatibility information in OWL-DL documents

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:07:25 -0400
Message-Id: <8E7FDAE5-A2A5-48D7-9A1E-705BD6BAAE32@gmail.com>
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, public-owl-dev@w3.org, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Alistair Miles <a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk>
Just to clarify. I would have it be a (separate) subsequent item on  
the agenda to give an OWL native semantics for AnnotationSubPropertyOf.

But first things first.

Incidentally, does OWL1.1 spec explicitly declare the RDF reification  
properties (subject, object, predicate) to be annotation properties  
as far as OWL 1.1 is concerned? IIRC, their presence in otherwise OWL- 
DL pushes an ontology to OWL Full.

-Alan

On Apr 18, 2007, at 1:52 PM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:

> Then rdfs-extras.rdf would have this (instead of the owl file)
>
>   <rdf:Property rdf:about="#annotationSubPropertyOf">
>     <rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="&rdfs;subPropertyOf"/>
>   </rdf:Property>
>
> Of course, I would like OWL to support reasoning on annotation  
> properties in some way, but the above is a little less ambitious  
> and might be a good first step.
>
> (there's a little more cleanup that had to be done to completely  
> repurpose the example. mylabel and annotationSubPropertyOf need to  
> be annotation properties in the OWL, and extras needs to say that  
> AnnotationProperty is a subclass of Property.)
>
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2007 18:07:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 27 March 2013 09:32:54 GMT