W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-dev@w3.org > April to June 2007

Re: Axiom annotations

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:50:52 +0100
Message-Id: <045A9396-5443-45A3-ABB3-93E6CE34E879@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, Boris Motik <bmotik@cs.man.ac.uk>, "'Alan Ruttenberg'" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, public-owl-dev@w3.org, "'chris mungall'" <cjm@fruitfly.org>
To: Matthew Pocock <matthew.pocock@ncl.ac.uk>

On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:41 AM, Matthew Pocock wrote:

> If you represent this in the RDF by reifying it, then presumably we  
> would have
> a URI for the axiom, or at least of the reified version of it?

You *can* but it's not required, since you can have a bnode.

I imagine, but haven't checked, that current tools use (only) Bnodes.  
The mapping certainly encourages this behavior.

Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2007 11:51:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:58:15 UTC