Dear All, We are looking for an OWL 1.1 ontology that is written in OWL functional-style syntax. We want to use it as a test case to help us work out what Sydney Syntax should look like if it stays close to the OWL1.1 functional syntax. Can anyone point us to such an example ontology ? So far, the only OWL1.1 ontology we have found is http://www.owldl.com/ontologies/family.owl and it is expressed in RDF/XML. Any help would be much appreciated. AnneReceived on Monday, 18 December 2006 13:37:12 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:13 GMT