W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-dev@w3.org > October to December 2006

Example OWL 1.1 ontology written in OWL functional-style syntax?

From: Anne Cregan <annec@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 00:36:45 +1100
To: <public-owl-dev@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1061218133644.15106@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Cc: "'Tommie Meyer'" <Thomas.Meyer@nicta.com.au>, "Rolf Schwitter" <rolfs@ics.mq.edu.au>, <pqui823@cse.unsw.EDU.AU>
Dear All,


We are looking for an OWL 1.1 ontology that is written in OWL 
functional-style syntax. 


We want to use it as a test case to help us work out what Sydney Syntax
should look like if it stays close to the OWL1.1 functional syntax.


Can anyone point us to such an example ontology ? 


So far, the only OWL1.1 ontology we have found is
http://www.owldl.com/ontologies/family.owl and it is expressed in RDF/XML.


Any help would be much appreciated.




Received on Monday, 18 December 2006 13:37:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:58:14 UTC