- From: Evren Sirin <evren@clarkparsia.com>
- Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 12:33:04 -0500
- To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- CC: public-owl-dev@w3.org
On 12/5/2006 12:09 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > PS: The family.owl linked from the OWL 1.1 web site currently appears > to be inconsistent with the RDF mapping spec (at least with respect to > the user-defined datatypes). > Yes, I've created the example based on the previous RDF mapping document and did not yet have a chance to update it according to the latest changes. Looking at the new specification now, I realize that the property owl:dataComplementOf has been renamed to owl:complementOf. Wouldn't using the same property for classes and datatypes cause a backward incompatibility issue as owl:disjointWith (when used for properties) which was renamed to owl:disjointObjectProperties and owl:disjointDataProperties in the latest version. Regards, Evren PS: Well, this might be being too picky buy why plural names were chosen for owl:disjointObjectProperties and owl:disjointDataProperties? We say [x owl:equivalentProperty y] so I would expect to say [x owl:disjointObjectProperty y].
Received on Tuesday, 5 December 2006 17:33:20 UTC