W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-dev@w3.org > October to December 2006

Re: OWL "Sydney Syntax", structured english

From: Kaarel Kaljurand <kaljurand@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:54:13 +0100
Message-ID: <161f6fb70611291254n720a03dcn84421b3424ddeb11@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Pat Hayes" <phayes@ihmc.us>
Cc: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "John McClure" <jmcclure@hypergrove.com>, "Anne Cregan" <annec@cse.unsw.edu.au>, public-owl-dev@w3.org


On 11/29/06, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us> wrote:
> We did however give up trying when it came to subpropertyof, I have
> to admit; and we use graphic conventions rather than text to indicate
> domain and range and other technical stuff. I'd love to see how
> anyone proposes to state domains and ranges in English.

What do you think about that:

Everything that loves something likes it.
Everything that writes something is a writer .
Everything that is written by something is a writing .
Everything something writes is a writing .

the last two are for range, one with a passive, the other without.

Received on Wednesday, 29 November 2006 20:54:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:58:14 UTC