W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-dev@w3.org > October to December 2006

Re: OWL "Sydney Syntax", structured english

From: Kaarel Kaljurand <kaljurand@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 20:26:57 +0100
Message-ID: <161f6fb70611291126m3ab9058x97c78063cffba68c@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: "Pat Hayes" <phayes@ihmc.us>, "John McClure" <jmcclure@hypergrove.com>, "Anne Cregan" <annec@cse.unsw.edu.au>, public-owl-dev@w3.org 

Hello,

On 11/29/06, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote:
>
> In the RoleNoun pattern, the verb is a generic/implicit 'has';
> rather than
>
>   Dan knows Pat.
>
> we write
>
>   Dan has acquaintance Pat.
>
> In N3, we allow the 'has' to be left out:
>
>   Dan acquaintance Pat.

How does this pattern work with negation (and other OWL features)?

Dan no acquaintance Pat?

-- 
kaarel
Received on Wednesday, 29 November 2006 19:27:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:13 GMT