W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-dev@w3.org > October to December 2006

Re: Additions to scope of OWL1.1

From: Christine Golbreich <Christine.Golbreich@univ-rennes1.fr>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:48:44 +0100
Message-ID: <01a401c7131d$d4bddb20$61875d80@LUZ>
To: "Hans Teijgeler" <hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl>
Cc: <public-owl-dev@w3.org>

indeed, as Bijan said,  exactly the same for me at this time
excuse-me.

Christine


----- Original Message -----
From: "Bijan Parsia" <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
To: "Hans Teijgeler" <hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl>
Cc: "'Christine Golbreich'" <christine.golbreich@univ-rennes1.fr>;
<public-owl-dev@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 12:35 PM
Subject: Re: Additions to scope of OWL1.1


> On Nov 28, 2006, at 11:30 AM, Hans Teijgeler wrote:
>
> > Christine, Bijan,
> >
> > May I ask you to give a response to my mail below?
>
> You may. But I've not had time/energy since Friday. Christine and I
> are trying to get the next OWLED first CFP out.
>
> > Perhaps it was rather dumb of me to bring this up, but then please
> > tell me
> > so.
>
> I don't see why it would be dumb. I just haven't had time to work
> through it. No need to tiptoe...this is as much a "help folks" forum
> as a "deep discussion" forum.
>
> > The problem we have is no less real, though. Is there a way out?
>
> Cheers,
> Bijan.
Received on Tuesday, 28 November 2006 18:48:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 27 March 2013 09:32:53 GMT