consider the following: <rdfs:subClassOf> <owl:Restriction> <owl:onProperty rdf:resource="#R"/> <owl:someValuesFrom rdf:resource="#P"/> </owl:Restriction> <owl:Class rdf:about="#Q"/> </rdfs:subClassOf> I need some clarifications about this term: are these statements true or false? 1) The construct above is legal in OWL DL/Full not OWL Lite -- right? (This is what the Wonderweb validator seems to indicate, although I found some of the OWL documents a bit unclear) 2) It is logically equivalent to the this FOL formula (KIFfy style): (implies (and (R x y) (P y)) (Q x)) 3) Assuming that IR is the inverse of R, it is also logically equivalent to: <rdfs:subClassOf> <owl:Class rdf:about="#P"/> <owl:Restriction> <owl:onProperty rdf:resource="#R"/> <owl:allValuesFrom rdf:resource="#Q"/> </owl:Restriction> </rdfs:subClassOf> Thank you, -- # Pierluigi Miraglia pierlu.m # Austin, Tex.Received on Sunday, 19 February 2006 04:08:33 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:13 GMT