W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-comments@w3.org > February 2012

Re: Comment syntax for OWL functional syntax ?

From: Ian Horrocks <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 21:59:58 +0000
Cc: public-owl-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <6BAF2883-F36A-4C03-A549-C63229289478@cs.man.ac.uk>
To: David Osumi-Sutherland <djs93@gen.cam.ac.uk>
Thanks for pointing this out. I added it to the errata list [1].

Regards,
Ian

[1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Errata


On 10 Feb 2012, at 11:31, David Osumi-Sutherland wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/#Annotations
> 
> States:
> 
> "Various OWL 2 syntaxes, such as the functional-style syntax, provide a mechanism for embedding comments into ontology documents. The structure of such comments is, however, dependent on the syntax, so these are simply discarded during parsing. In contrast, annotations are "first-class citizens" in the structural specification of OWL 2, and their structure is independent of the underlying syntax. "
> 
> If it is true that functional syntax has a comment system, what is its syntax?  I couldn't find any reference to it in the spec, and from this thread it looks like maybe there isn't one:
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2011Mar/0004.html
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> David
> 
> David Osumi-Sutherland, PhD
> Ontologist
> FlyBase / Virtual Fly Brain
> Department of Genetics,
> University of Cambridge,
> Downing Street,
> Cambridge, CB2 3EH, UK
> Tel: +44 (0)1223 333 963
> Fax: +44 (0)1223 766 732
> http://www.virtualflybrain.org
> 
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2012 22:00:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 15 February 2012 22:00:26 GMT