W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-comments@w3.org > May 2010

Issue 22

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 22:36:56 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTimeNofzsnz3Y6_ciZvT0JktswS0U8xmIgaWsMmj@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-owl-comments@w3.org
As the working group is not officially closed, I wonder if it is worth
reconsidering Issue 22 [1], for which there was further information
and a solution offered in a an paper: "A Solution for the Man-Man
Problem in the Family History Knowledge Base" Dmitry Tsarkov and
Ulrike Sattler and Margaret Stevens and Robert Stevens.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/22?changelog
[2] http://www.webont.org/owled/2009/papers/owled2009_submission_32.pdf

The paper offers evidence that the feature is of utility, offers a
syntax and and reasoner implementation.


(as OWL user, not chair)
Received on Sunday, 23 May 2010 02:37:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:01:30 UTC