W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-comments@w3.org > September 2009

Re: [LC response] To Daniel Barclay

From: Barclay, Daniel <daniel@fgm.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 12:38:14 -0400
Message-ID: <4A9E9F76.3060809@fgm.com>
To: "Christine Golbreich" <cgolbrei@gmail.com>
Cc: <public-owl-comments@w3.org>
Christine Golbreich wrote:
> Dear Daniel,
> Thank you for your comment
>      <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Aug/0022.html>
> on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.
> We appreciate your careful reading of the document, and have made the
> necessary corrections.
> Please acknowledge receipt of this email to
> <mailto:public-owl-comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should
> suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you
> are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment.

I don't have time to check all those comments.

Can I just declare that I assume the response was satisfactory (and if in
a future draft I notice that a problem remains I just have to re-report it)?

(Plain text sometimes corrupted to HTML "courtesy" of Microsoft Exchange.) [F]
Received on Wednesday, 2 September 2009 16:39:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:01:30 UTC