- From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 16:53:31 +0100
- To: Daniel Barclay <daniel@fgm.com>
- Cc: public-owl-comments@w3.org
Dear Daniel,
Thank you for your comment
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/
2009Aug/0038.html>
on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.
We appreciate your careful reading of the document, and have made the
necessary correction [1].
[1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?
title=Syntax&diff=25473&oldid=25433
Please acknowledge receipt of this email to <mailto:public-owl-
comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should suffice). In your
acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you are satisfied
with the working group's response to your comment.
Regards,
Ian Horrocks
on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group
> In the OWL 2 Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax
> specification at http://www.w3org/TR/2009/CR-owl2-syntax-20090611/,
> section 2.4 says:
>
> ... a prefix name is often identified with the prefix IRI is
> associated
> with ...
>
> (As written, that is unparseable.)
>
>
>
> Daniel
> --
> (Plain text sometimes corrupted to HTML "courtesy" of Microsoft
> Exchange.) [F]
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 1 September 2009 15:54:39 UTC