W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-comments@w3.org > May 2009

RE: [LC response] To Jeremy Carroll Re: nice comment: versioning

From: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 10:11:19 -0700
To: "'Peter F.Patel-Schneider'" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: <public-owl-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <002d01c9d580$2a97ee60$7fc7cb20$@com>

Thanks greatly - the new features text is just what we were looking for.

Jeremy


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter F.Patel-Schneider [mailto:pfps@research.bell-labs.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 7:10 AM
> To: jeremy@topquadrant.com
> Cc: public-owl-comments@w3.org
> Subject: [LC response] To Jeremy Carroll Re: nice comment: versioning
> 
> Dear Jeremy,
> 
> Thank you for your comment
>      <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-
> comments/2009May/0015.html>
> on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.
> 
> Thank you for your positive comment on the new versioning setup in OWL
> 2.
> 
> We draw your attention to the Primer, New Features and Rationale, and
> Quick Reference Guide documents, with editors' drafts available at
> <http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Primer,
> <http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/New_Features_and_Rationale>, and
> <http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Quick_Reference_Guide>. Each of these
> user-friendly documents mention the improvements in OWL 2, but this is
> particularly the case in New Features and Rationale.
> 
> Please acknowledge receipt of this email to
> <mailto:public-owl-comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should
> suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you
> are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment.
> 
> Regards,
> Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group
Received on Friday, 15 May 2009 17:12:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 15 May 2009 17:12:33 GMT