W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-comments@w3.org > May 2009

new comment: reification vocab

From: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 15:22:11 -0700
To: <public-owl-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <003101c9d350$183041f0$4890c5d0$@com>

We did not reach consensus within TopQuadrant about the merits or otherwise of using reification for annotations.

However, we believe it is an error to duplicate the RDF reification vocabulary in the OWL namespace.
The well-established convention is that one reuses the RDF vocabulary. The apparent motivation is because RDF reification is seen as semantically problematic. These issues are not addressed by using the same vocabulary in a different namespace.

We request that you use rdf:subject, rdf:predicate and rdf:object in place of owl:subject etc.

Jeremy Carroll, AC Rep. TopQuadrant, Inc
Received on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 22:22:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 12 May 2009 22:22:55 GMT