- From: Umberto Straccia <umberto.straccia@isti.cnr.it>
- Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 08:36:31 +0200
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: public-owl-comments@w3.org
Ok. -umberto Straccia On Apr 30, 2009, at 6:12 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > Dear Umberto, > > Thank you for your comment > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Apr/0075.html > > > on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts. > > Unfortunately, adding syntactic sugar does have a significant > specification and consensus building cost, particularly as it adds to > the OWL 2 vocabulary, which has already been objected to by some > communities (see, e.g., [1]). Therefore the working group has decided > not to augment the language with the ObjectImplicationOf constructor > at > this time. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/65 > > Please acknowledge receipt of this email to > <mailto:public-owl-comments@w3.org> > (replying to this email should suffice). In your acknowledgment please > let us know whether or not you are satisfied with the working group's > response to your comment. > > Regards, > Peter Patel-Schneider
Received on Friday, 1 May 2009 06:37:15 UTC