W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-comments@w3.org > July 2009

Re: [LC response] To Simon Reinhardt Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy and version IRI

From: Simon Reinhardt <simon.reinhardt@koeln.de>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:55:17 +0200
Message-ID: <4A4B78D5.4060906@koeln.de>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
CC: public-owl-comments@w3.org
Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> Dear Simon,
> 
> Thank you for your comment
>  <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Jun/0005.html>
> on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.
> 
> The OWL WG was chartered to define OWL 2 and we consider guidance on
> best practice to be outside the charter of the group. We suggest that
> you might find it useful to discuss this in other fora such as
> 
>    public-owl-dev@w3.org
>    public-lod@w3.org
>    semantic-web@w3.org

Fair enough. I would consider it as an issue of the working group since you define owl:versionIRI and since you extend on the vocabulary that includes rdfs:isDefinedBy [1] and list it as an annotation property [2]. But the definition of rdfs:isDefinedBy has always been (deliberately) vague so I can understand if you regard it as out of scope - it's your decision after all. :-)

> Please acknowledge receipt of this email to
> <mailto:public-owl-comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should
> suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you
> are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment.

Acknowledged!

Regards,
  Simon


[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-owl2-rdf-based-semantics-20090611/#Vocabulary_Terms
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-owl2-rdf-based-semantics-20090611/#Semantic_Conditions_for_the_Vocabulary_Properties
Received on Wednesday, 1 July 2009 14:56:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 1 July 2009 14:56:06 GMT