- From: Simon Reinhardt <simon.reinhardt@koeln.de>
- Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:55:17 +0200
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- CC: public-owl-comments@w3.org
Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > Dear Simon, > > Thank you for your comment > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Jun/0005.html> > on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts. > > The OWL WG was chartered to define OWL 2 and we consider guidance on > best practice to be outside the charter of the group. We suggest that > you might find it useful to discuss this in other fora such as > > public-owl-dev@w3.org > public-lod@w3.org > semantic-web@w3.org Fair enough. I would consider it as an issue of the working group since you define owl:versionIRI and since you extend on the vocabulary that includes rdfs:isDefinedBy [1] and list it as an annotation property [2]. But the definition of rdfs:isDefinedBy has always been (deliberately) vague so I can understand if you regard it as out of scope - it's your decision after all. :-) > Please acknowledge receipt of this email to > <mailto:public-owl-comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should > suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you > are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment. Acknowledged! Regards, Simon [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-owl2-rdf-based-semantics-20090611/#Vocabulary_Terms [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-owl2-rdf-based-semantics-20090611/#Semantic_Conditions_for_the_Vocabulary_Properties
Received on Wednesday, 1 July 2009 14:56:05 UTC