W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-comments@w3.org > February 2009

Re: [LC Response] To Jonathan Rees Re: octets vs. characters

From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:12:39 -0500
Cc: public-owl-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <C2302A18-2629-4D42-8AB9-1D83F7617CDE@creativecommons.org>
To: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
I have received the reply to this comment and am satisfied with the  
working group's response.

On Feb 19, 2009, at 10:44 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:

> Dear Jonathan,
> Thank you for your message
>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Feb/0001.html
> on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.
> You are completely correct that there is no need for the RDF Mapping  
> to
> be concerned about the exact form of an input document.  The only  
> thing
> that matters is that an input document can be parsed into an RDF  
> graph.
> There has to be some concern with documents to handle imports,  
> however.
> The document has therefore been changed to read
>    An RDF Syntax ontology document is any document accessible from  
> some
>    given IRI that can be parsed into an RDF graph, ...
> The diffs can be found at
> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Mapping_to_RDF_Graphs&diff=18155&oldid=17663
> The WG considers this to be an editorial change.
> Please acknowledge receipt of this email to
> <mailto:public-owl-comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should
> suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you
> are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment.
> Regards,
> Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group
Received on Thursday, 19 February 2009 22:13:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:01:29 UTC