W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-comments@w3.org > August 2009

Fwd: [LC response] To Holger Knublauch

From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 12:37:11 +0100
Message-Id: <57199018-E8BE-4181-991A-A4D08F120FAA@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Cc: public-owl-comments@w3.org
To: timrdf@gmail.com
Dear Tim,

I should have CCed you on this message -- sorry. Hopefully our  
response to Holger also addresses your concern.

Regards,
Ian


Begin forwarded message:

> Resent-From: public-owl-comments@w3.org
> From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
> Date: 13 August 2009 12:28:57 BDT
> To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
> Cc: public-owl-comments@w3.org
> Subject: [LC response] To Holger Knublauch
>
> Dear Holger,
>
> Thank you for your comment
>      <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/ 
> 2009Jul/0007.html>
> on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.
>
> The working group has decided to take up your suggestion and define  
> an RDF specification of the OWL 2 vocabulary in the RDF/XML  
> exchange format. A draft of this specification can be found at [1].  
> The intention is that, when OWL 2 becomes a recommendation, the  
> specification will be placed at [2].
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Owl2DotOwlDevel
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl
>
> Please acknowledge receipt of this email to <mailto:public-owl- 
> comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should suffice). In your  
> acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you are satisfied  
> with the working group's response to your comment.
>
> Regards,
> Ian Horrocks
> on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 13 August 2009 11:38:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 August 2009 11:38:05 GMT