- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:10:36 +0200
- To: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-owl-comments@w3.org
2009/8/11 Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>: > Dear Danny, > > I refer to the email below sent on the 26th June last. I would be very > grateful if you could confirm whether or not you > are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment. I am satisfied with the working group's response. Sorry Ian, clumsy of me not to respond sooner. Cheers, Danny. > On 26 Jun 2008, at 08:04, Peter Patel-Schneider wrote: > >> Dear Danny, >> >> Thank you for your comment >> >> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Jun/0004.html> >> on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts. >> >> Although the shorthand "a" is in the Turtle document, >> http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/turtle, the document does not provide >> an expansion for it. This makes use of the shorthand problematic in OWL >> 2 documents, even in non-normative documents like the OWL 2 Primer. >> >> Many examples in OWL 2, for example in the Primer, already have two RDF >> syntaxes - RDF/XML and Turtle. The OWL WG feels that adding a third RDF >> syntax would not provide sufficient benefit to justify both the work >> involved in adding the extra syntax and the extra load on readers in >> reading or even just determining not to read the extra syntax. >> >> Therefore the OWL WG will not be making any change to its documents in >> response to this comment. >> >> Please acknowledge receipt of this email to >> <mailto:public-owl-comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should >> suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you >> are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment. >> >> Regards, >> Peter F. Patel-Schneider >> on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group > > > -- http://danny.ayers.name
Received on Wednesday, 12 August 2009 22:11:18 UTC