W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-comments@w3.org > August 2009

Re: [LC Response] To Jacco van Ossenbruggen Re: Confusion about the status of the XML Serialisation syntax

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 12:57:53 -0400
Message-ID: <20090807.125753.35192717.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: <Jacco.van.Ossenbruggen@cwi.nl>
CC: <public-owl-comments@w3.org>
From: Jacco van Ossenbruggen <Jacco.van.Ossenbruggen@cwi.nl>
Subject: Re: [LC Response] To Jacco van Ossenbruggen Re: Confusion about the status of the XML Serialisation syntax
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 11:35:52 -0500

> Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>> Dear Jacco,
>>
>> We sent a response
>> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Mar/0038.html>
>> to your comment on our OWL 2 specifications, and in our response we
>> asked if you are satisfied. We have not yet heard back from you. If we
>> do not hear from you soon, we will proceed on the assumption you are
>> satisfied with our response. 
>>
>> Regards,
>> Peter F. Patel-Schneider
>> on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group 
>>
>>   
> Dear WG,
> 
> Thanks for clarifying the status of  the XML syntax, and for adding the 
> view to allow browsing the examples in RDF triple syntax.
> I am fully satisfied with your response.
> 
> Regards, Jacco
> 
> PS: Peter, apologies for the delay of this acknowledgement, your 
> response was sent on the day my son was born... :-)
> 
> 
> 
No problem.  I even updated the LC page to account for this reply.

peter
Received on Friday, 7 August 2009 16:59:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 7 August 2009 16:59:38 GMT