W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-comments@w3.org > April 2009

[LC response] To Umberto Straccia (1)

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:26:51 +0100
Message-Id: <134FE7DD-5F8D-4251-B61B-C9CF7193CC96@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: public-owl-comments@w3.org
To: umberto.straccia@isti.cnr.it
Dear Umberto,

Thank you for your comment

     <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Apr/ 
0074.html>
on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.

While we appreciate the use case raised in your comment, we found  
that the specification and technical difficulties of adding such a  
feature at this time outweigh the benefits it would bring. The  
working group has, therefore, decided to make no change to OWL 2 in  
response to your comment.

Please note that a similar issue was raised in the first last call  
round and there is a more detailed discussion in that reply:

<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Jan/ 
0063.html>

The work-arounds in that message are mostly relevant here as well.

Please acknowledge receipt of this email to <mailto:public-owl- 
comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should suffice). In your  
acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you are satisfied  
with the working group's response to your comment.

Regards,
Bijan Parsia
on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group
Received on Thursday, 30 April 2009 13:23:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 30 April 2009 13:23:01 GMT