W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-comments@w3.org > April 2009

Re: [ontolog-forum] Last Call: OWL 2 and rdf:text primitive datatype

From: Pavithra <pavithra_kenjige@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:07:47 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <753826.41155.qm@web38307.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
To: "\[ontolog-forum\]" <ontolog-forum@ontolog.cim3.net>
Cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, public-owl-comments@w3.org





Acceptance of words and meanings, is learned by its usage!   I believe the term "Class" was derived from the word "classification" to represent abstract data types.   To me it makes perfect sense.   Even though the implementation / usage varies  according the specific programming language. 
 
In Anglo Saxon vocabulary  the term "issue" means "a child / children"  and it is used heavily in Wikipedia.  If you look up a person in Wikipedia, you can see that at the personal profile.  [ To me,   it is confusing! How can a child be an issue?  A child is child.  ]
 
Just an objective observation! 
 
Pavithra Kenjige

---








 
 


--- On Sun, 4/26/09, Richard H. McCullough <rhm@pioneerca.com> wrote:


From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@pioneerca.com>
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Last Call: OWL 2 and rdf:text primitive datatype
To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@ontolog.cim3.net>
Cc: "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>, public-owl-comments@w3.org
Date: Sunday, April 26, 2009, 4:34 PM


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@bestweb.net.
> 
> In current terminology, we have three terms 'set', 'class', and 'type'.
> The words 'set' and 'type' have long histories in both technical and
> informal usage, and there is no confusion about their meanings.
> 
> The word 'class' has been used in so many conflicting ways in both
> technical and informal usage that it causes a great deal of confusion.
> 
> Therefore, my recommendation is to prefer the words 'set' and 'type'
> for all metalevel usage, both technical and informal.  The word
> 'class' could still be used for particular languages in which it
> is endemic.  But to promote precision, the words 'set' and 'type'
> should be preferred for all cross-language discussions.
> 
> John Sowa
> 
Don't forget the word 'concept', as used in natural language.
The Rand ITOE 1990 book is a good reference for concept-related
terminology.  Rand terminology is based on Aristotle.
My tabula rasa terminology is based on Rand.

> Dick McCullough
http://mkrmke.org



_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@ontolog.cim3.net
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@ontolog.cim3.net



-----Inline Attachment Follows-----



_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@ontolog.cim3.net
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@ontolog.cim3.net
Received on Monday, 27 April 2009 08:04:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 08:05:23 GMT