W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-comments@w3.org > April 2009

Re: [ontolog-forum] Last Call: OWL 2 and rdf:text primitive datatype

From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@pioneerca.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:34:51 -0700
Message-ID: <9D40EA54A2C84AAB9B48C3D1845B292B@rhm8200>
To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@ontolog.cim3.net>
Cc: "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>, <public-owl-comments@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@bestweb.net.
> In current terminology, we have three terms 'set', 'class', and 'type'.
> The words 'set' and 'type' have long histories in both technical and
> informal usage, and there is no confusion about their meanings.
> The word 'class' has been used in so many conflicting ways in both
> technical and informal usage that it causes a great deal of confusion.
> Therefore, my recommendation is to prefer the words 'set' and 'type'
> for all metalevel usage, both technical and informal.  The word
> 'class' could still be used for particular languages in which it
> is endemic.  But to promote precision, the words 'set' and 'type'
> should be preferred for all cross-language discussions.
> John Sowa
Don't forget the word 'concept', as used in natural language.
The Rand ITOE 1990 book is a good reference for concept-related
terminology.  Rand terminology is based on Aristotle.
My tabula rasa terminology is based on Rand.

> Dick McCullough
Received on Sunday, 26 April 2009 20:35:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:01:29 UTC