W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-comments@w3.org > April 2009

Fwd: [LC response] To Jeremy Carroll

From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 11:30:06 +0100
Message-Id: <157BCC4D-79E3-425C-AD13-37C02C3507E5@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
To: public-owl-comments@w3.org
Begin forwarded message:

> From: "Jeremy Carroll" <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
> Date: 2 April 2009 15:07:40 BDT
> To: "'Ian Horrocks'" <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
> Subject: RE: [LC response] To Jeremy Carroll
>
>
> This is fine thanks.
> Jeremy
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ian Horrocks [mailto:ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk]
>> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 1:22 PM
>> To: Jeremy Carroll
>> Cc: public-owl-comments@w3.org
>> Subject: [LC response] To Jeremy Carroll
>>
>> Dear Jeremy,
>>
>> Thank you for your comment
>>       <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/
>> 2009Feb/0008.html>
>> on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.
>>
>> Thank you for pointing out this problem. The Syntactic Conformance
>> section of the Conformance and Test Cases document (see [1]) has been
>> revised to be clearer in general and to rectify these problems in
>> particular. The main definitions of the different kinds of ontology
>> documents now refer explicitly to the RDF/XML syntax and are now
>> complete definitions, e.g.:
>>
>> "An OWL 2 DL ontology document is an OWL 2 Full ontology document
>> that can be successfully parsed using the canonical parsing process
>> as defined in the OWL 2 Syntax specification [OWL 2 Specification]
>> and the procedure for mapping from RDF graphs to the structural
>> specification described in the OWL 2 Mapping to RDF Graphs [OWL 2
>> Mapping to RDF Graphs] to produce an instance of the OWL 2 ontology
>> class satisfying all of the restrictions described in Section 3 of
>> the OWL 2 Syntax specification [OWL 2 Specification]."
>>
>> Similarly, the example is now specific to the XML syntax. It says "An
>> XML document is an OWL 2 DL ontology document iff [certain conditions
>> are met]"; i.e., an XML document is an OWL 2 DL ontology document if
>> said conditions are met, and it is not an OWL 2 DL ontology document
>> if said conditions are not met.
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/
>> Conformance_and_Test_Cases#Syntactic_Conformance
>>
>> Please acknowledge receipt of this email to <mailto:public-owl-
>> comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should suffice). In your
>> acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you are satisfied
>> with the working group's response to your comment.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ian Horrocks
>> on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group
>
Received on Friday, 3 April 2009 10:30:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 3 April 2009 10:30:59 GMT