W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ostatus@w3.org > April 2012

Re: OStatus and webfinger vs swd

From: Goix Laurent Walter <laurentwalter.goix@telecomitalia.it>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 11:28:38 +0200
To: elf Pavlik <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
CC: public-ostatus <public-ostatus@w3.org>
Message-ID: <0D7DA9B1-03C9-4FA2-88BE-4A842BA3663C@telecomitalia.it>
Ostatus (but also other community initiatives in the area of fsw) have been using (meaning implementing, testing & validating) webfinger for years now and it would be indeed a pity to throw away this work. That said, the 'ietf' webfinger may be a good momentum for cleaning up/improving the original community spec with future proof features & the feedback gathered over the last years.

I agree that anyway all the current fsw initiatives should align with the solution that will be adopted in ietf (wf or swd) to limit fragmentation.


Le 14 avr. 2012 à 08:34, "elf Pavlik" <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> a écrit :

> --- Begin forwarded message from Michiel de Jong ---
> From: Michiel de Jong <michiel@unhosted.org>
> To: ostatus-discuss <ostatus-discuss@googlegroups.com>
> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 20:27:11 +0000
> Subject: OStatus and webfinger vs swd
> Hi!
> There's a discussion going on about webfinger vs swd:
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg08736.html

> There will be a choice between one or the other, and then the other
> one will be deprecated. The discussion will take place on
> apps-discuss@ietf.org, and the OAuth WG already has committed to
> accepting whatever outcome from it. I think OStatus should commit to
> it, too.
> It would be really bad if there finally were concensus about this, and
> then OStatus would ruin it by not recognizing that concensus. What do
> you think?
> I think this is important.
> Cheers!
> Michiel
> --- End forwarded message ---

Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie.

This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks.

Received on Saturday, 14 April 2012 09:29:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:35:32 UTC