Re: A Big Proposal: A way to control quality/resolution/framreate/simulcast/layering with RtpSender

Can you describe this as a use case?


On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>wrote:

> On 19 February 2014 07:15, Chris Wendt <chris-w3c@chriswendt.net> wrote:
> > I don’t believe there shouldn’t be aspirations of having a priority or
> > frame-rate vs quality parameters meaning anything explicit, with any
> > expected outcome other than a “preference" that guides the underlying
> > implementation to “try" to conform to.
>
> That's a reasonable starting point.  If this were:
>
> priority: 0.5,   // give half the resources of something with priority 1
> preferences: {
>   scale: 1, // don't downsample if you please
>   framerate: 30, // keep the frame rate here
>   quality: // I have no idea what metric we should be using here
>             // (0..1 where 0 = 0 bits and 1 = all the bits?)
> }
>

Received on Wednesday, 19 February 2014 19:27:51 UTC