Re: [Poplus] Popolo and JSON-LD

James, just responding on a couple of your earlier points:

> (1) that plain JSON allows using project-specific identifiers in the *_id
fields, whereas JSON-LD shouldn’t use any *_id fields

Isnt it possible to have both? A JSON-LD object could have "id" and "@id"
if necessary.

> Allowing the use of internal identifiers without having to produce a URL
for those identifiers has been a clear use case, hence the *_id fields.

Could you please expand a bit on these use cases specifically?

I'm currently doing some civic API work and Popolo has been a big
inspiration. I'm also keen to encourage linked data where it makes sense.
So this is a useful conversation.

Paul

On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Martín Szyszlican <martinsz@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi, this conversation was interesting. Did you guys reach an agreement on
> how to add json-ld to popolo?
>
> I have no use case for it, but I like standardy standards.
>
> 2015-04-14 5:38 GMT+00:00 Andreas Kuckartz <a.kuckartz@ping.de>:
>
>> Am 13.04.2015 17:28, schrieb James McKinney:
>> >> On Apr 13, 2015, at 1:19 AM, Andreas Kuckartz
>> >> <A.Kuckartz@ping.de> wrote: I would like to analyse the data,
>> >> convert it to RDF and do something with that heap of Linked Data
>> >> (and in combination with other Linked Data). Currently I can do
>> >> none of these.
>> >
>> > More common use cases are, “I want a list of all Canadian MPs” or
>> > “I want an API for all votes in the House of Commons.”
>>
>> These are perfect examples of "do something with that heap of Linked
>> Data" ;-)
>>
>> > I think you’ll need to do some research yourself, which if you
>> > share with the community, others might contribute to.
>>
>> The is now a Wiki page on which I am collecting such information
>> (starting with the info you provided):
>> https://github.com/OpenGovLD/specs/wiki/List-of-data-providers
>>
>> > The only way to avoid out-of-band contexts is to eliminate the
>> > plain JSON serialization, which I think will be an unpopular
>> > choice.
>>
>> That can easily be misunderstood: The addition of support for media
>> type "application/ld+json" does *not* require the removal of support
>> for "application/json".
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Andreas
>>
>> --
>> Poplus.org - Get involved: http://poplus.org/get-involved
>>    IRC: #poplus https://webchat.freenode.net
>>    Docs: http://bit.ly/poplusdrive
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Poplus - Collaborative Civic Coding" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to poplus+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
>> To post to this group, send an email to poplus@googlegroups.com.
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/poplus.
>> To view this discussion on the web, visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/poplus/552CA7C0.20700%40ping.de.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Martín Szyszlican*
> Desarrollo web usable y accesible
> martinszyszlican.com
>
>
>
>  --
> Poplus.org - Get involved: http://poplus.org/get-involved
> IRC: #poplus https://webchat.freenode.net
> Docs: http://bit.ly/poplusdrive
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Poplus - Collaborative Civic Coding" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to poplus+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to poplus@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/poplus.
> To view this discussion on the web, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/poplus/CAKTxXVV1W7v9gxzjKxaqk6fKs%2BTsMZ6bRFBrL5ew_LSWgwZbMw%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/poplus/CAKTxXVV1W7v9gxzjKxaqk6fKs%2BTsMZ6bRFBrL5ew_LSWgwZbMw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>