Re: Multiple URIs for one annotation body

Dear Isabel,
I wonder if, by following the example number 13 in the current draft of the
spec,
http://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-model/#semantic-tags
you could do:

"body": {
    "@type": "oa:SemanticTag",
    "related": "http://dbpedia.org/resource/Paris”
    “page”:”http://dbpedia.org/page/Paris”
},

where related is skos:related and page is foaf:page.
Or do you need to be more precise than that? Another more specific skos
term?

Best,
Paolo


On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Isabel Barth <barth@zpid.de> wrote:

>  Hello all,
>
> we are currently working on a project that involves annotating free text
> with ontology concepts.
> We are using concepts from different bioportal ontologies and we are
> wondering what is the best way to represent one concept with two different
> URIs:
> One URI is the link to the bioportal view of the concept (this one is
> required by the GUI of our application), the second URI is the conceptID
> (as specified in the onotology itself; required for SPARQL queries and
> reasoning).
>
> - Is it sensible to create two different annotation bodies for this
> purpose?
> - If there a standard way / vocabulary to discriminate the different types
> of URIs? (We found an ontology of Resources for Linked Data; IRW
>   [Identity and Reference on the Web]
>
> An annotation could look like this:
>     <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.xyz.de/resource/annotation1"
> <http://www.xyz.de/resource/annotation1>>
>         <oa:hasBody   rdf:resource="http://www.xyz.de/resource/body1"
> <http://www.xyz.de/resource/body1>/>
>         <oa:hasTarget rdf:resource=
> "http://www.xyz.de/resource/annotationContext1"
> <http://www.xyz.de/resource/annotationContext1>/>
>    </rdf:Description>
>
>   <rdf:Description rdf:about=="http://www.xyz.de/resource/body1"
> <http://www.xyz.de/resource/body1>>
>        <irw:refersTo   rdf:resource=[real ConceptID here]/>"
>        <irw:accesses  rdf:resource=[browser URI for Concept here]/>"
>    </rdf:Description>
>
> Would this be the way to go or is there an easier way / did I
> misunderstand the Open Annotation data model?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Kind regards,
>
> Isabel Barth
>



-- 
Dr. Paolo Ciccarese
Principal Knowledge and Software Engineer at PerkinElmer Innovation Lab
Assistant Professor in Neurology at Harvard Medical School

Assistant in Neuroscience at Mass General Hospital
ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5156-2703