- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 14:52:05 -0400
- To: public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>
FYI. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Annotation Working Group (until 2014-08-19) Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 18:48:46 +0000 Resent-From: public-new-work@w3.org Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 19:48:03 +0100 From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> To: public-new-work@w3.org CC: ij@w3.org Dear all, This is an interesting charter tackling an important need. I am supportive of it. I have a couple of comments/suggestions. Given that the charter makes explicit reference to provenance, I think it should also refer to the Provenance Working Group and/or PROV in section 3. Furthermore, the Open Annotation Data Model was building on W3C PROV. Thus, it is important that provenance-related aspects specified by the Annotation Working Group remain compatible with PROV. This should be part of the charter. It would be useful to clarify which media types beyond HTML5, if any, the proposed working intends to focus on for Robust Link Anchoring. In the Provenance Working Group, for a short period, there were discussions about annotations of provenance. I am not expecting anchoring on provenance to be in scope of this future Working Group, but it would be nice if its anchoring model could be general enough, to be instantiable (which implies shareable, archivable, etc) for provenance. Regards, Luc -- Professor Luc Moreau Head of the Web and Internet Science Group Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton twitter: @lucmoreau Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Wednesday, 13 August 2014 18:52:38 UTC