W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-openannotation@w3.org > March 2013

Re: [PROPOSAL] DomRangeSelector

From: Randall Leeds <randall.leeds@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 18:53:30 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAL6JQhGR_fVVEL=X6Vt3s_7wo+SEB5MuHQ+1ZUW2V1Spfa1KA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Herbert van de Sompel <hvdsomp@gmail.com>
Cc: public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>
I'm now thinking about re-evaluating this as a fragment selector with
an xpointer syntax range syntax rather than expand the selector space.
That seems like the most rigorously specified w3 approach.

On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Randall Leeds <randall.leeds@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 3:58 AM, Herbert van de Sompel
> <hvdsomp@gmail.com> wrote:
>> hi Randall,
>> I did a brief presentation about Open Annotation at a recent EUDAT
>> meeting (http://www.eudat.eu/2nd-eudat-user-forum) and got a question
>> from the audience along the same lines of what you describe. If I
>> remember correctly the person asking the question was involved in TEI
>> work.
> Something similar just came up in the change tracking WG, as well.
> It seems many people desire to serialize document ranges. I do think
> the DOM Range spec is the sensible place to start, but it doesn't
> define a serialization.
> Maybe someone ought to?
Received on Saturday, 30 March 2013 01:53:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:22:03 UTC