W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-openannotation@w3.org > July 2013

RE: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-07-02

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:25:32 +0200
To: "'Pat Hayes'" <phayes@ihmc.us>
Cc: "'Linked JSON'" <public-linked-json@w3.org>, "'RDF WG'" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, "'public-openannotation'" <public-openannotation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <009901ce7d79$573db620$05b92260$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 5:23 AM, Pat Hayes wrote:
> On Jul 9, 2013, at 4:23 AM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:> 
> > On Tuesday, July 09, 2013 6:46 AM, Pat Hayes wrote:
> >> On Jul 8, 2013, at 1:01 PM, Robert Sanderson wrote:
> >>> Something like:
> >>>
> >>> rdf:listHead  -- The object, which must be a blank node with
> rdf:type
> >> rdf:List, is the first entry in a list associated with the subject
> >> resource.
> >>
> >> I guess I don't follow this. If the object is of type LIst, and it
> is
> >> the first item in a list, then you have a list of lists. Which is
> >> legal, but I don't see how it helps with the problem we have here.
> And
> >> what does "associated with" mean?
> >
> > I think was Robert meant was something like
> >
> >    <> rdf:ListHead _:head .
> >    <> ... other properties of <> ...
> >    _:head rdf:type rdf:List .
> >    _:head rdf:first ...
> >    _:head rdf:rest _:item2 .
> >    _:item2 ...
> 
> Ah, OK. But then we get back to my previous point. All this wriggling
> can't get us past the fact that if this means what it is supposed to
> mean, then the truth conditions on rdf:ListHead are going to be that
> 
> <1> rdf:ListHead <2> is true just when <1> = <2>.

Fully agree but I think what Robert is looking for is something similar to
rdf:value but specifically for lists.


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler
Received on Wednesday, 10 July 2013 14:26:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 10 July 2013 14:26:13 UTC