W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-openannotation@w3.org > February 2013

Re: New Specification Published!

From: Paolo Ciccarese <paolo.ciccarese@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 08:40:08 -0500
Message-ID: <CAFPX2kA_Acjh0uhBrpmdnFCnex1JmWGWYZwdOB2LPgjjrQ8DtA@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>
Dear all,
thank you for your contributions and your support throughout this process!
Your feedback has been really important in order to get this done.

As co-chair, I also would like to  publicly thank Rob for the really
amazing work he put into the current specs.

Paolo

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 5:35 AM, Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com> wrote:

> Congratulations on the new spec! The level of discussion and
> collaboration around openannoation has been really impressive.
>
> I apologize if this has come up before, but is there a plan to move
> the vocabulary over into the w3c namespace? I happened to have a
> conversation with Phil Archer at the w3c last week who (correct me if
> I'm wrong here Phil) indicated that this is a service that the w3c has
> been thinking about offering for community groups. The idea being that
> a vocabulary could have a persistent home at the w3c. Also, I think a
> w3c namespace for openannotation would lend the vocabulary some
> additional credibility outside the digital library domain.
>
> I thought I would ask now, as we can expect more openannotation
> implementations in the near future :-)
>
> //Ed
>
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Firstly, thank you all so much for your hard work and engagement in
> > this process. We could not have gotten to this point without this
> > fantastic community. So it is with great pride that we announce the
> > publication of the next version of the Open Annotation specification:
> >
> >     http://www.openannotation.org/spec/core/
> >
> > This replaces the previous version of May 9th, 2012 and is (of course)
> > the version that we have been discussing at /spec/future/
> >
> > There may be minor typos left which were not caught. Please let us
> > know if you find any and we'll fix them, but any further changes to
> > the actual data model will have to wait to go through the next round
> > of feedback and revision.
> >
> > Many thanks,
> >
> > Rob and Paolo
> >
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Firstly, thank you all so much for your hard work and engagement in
> > this process. We could not have gotten to this point without this
> > fantastic community. So it is with great pride that we announce the
> > publication of the next version of the Open Annotation specification:
> >
> >     http://www.openannotation.org/spec/core/
> >
> > This replaces the previous version of May 9th, 2012 and is (of course)
> > the version that we have been discussing at /spec/future/
> >
> > There may be minor typos left which were not caught. Please let us
> > know if you find any and we'll fix them, but any further changes to
> > the actual data model will have to wait to go through the next round
> > of feedback and revision.
> >
> > Many thanks,
> >
> > Rob and Paolo
> >
>
>


-- 
Dr. Paolo Ciccarese
http://www.paolociccarese.info/
Biomedical Informatics Research & Development
Instructor of Neurology at Harvard Medical School
Assistant in Neuroscience at Mass General Hospital
Member of the MGH Biomedical Informatics Core

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is intended only for the addressee(s),
may contain information that is considered
to be sensitive or confidential and may not be forwarded or disclosed to
any other party without the permission of the sender.
If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender
immediately.
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2013 13:40:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:22:03 UTC