W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-openannotation@w3.org > February 2013

Re: New Specification Published!

From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 11:55:17 +0000
Message-ID: <511244A5.6070908@w3.org>
To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
CC: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>, public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>
Thanks for pinging me on this Ed.

The simplest thing for us certainly is to just upload the files to the 
relevant bit of w3.org. It's not a one time operation - if you find that 
you need to correct mistakes then, OK, we'll correct them, however, the 
principle would be that the URIs and their associated semantics won't 
change.

An actual area that you control is, as Ivan points out, more complex and 
setting up redirects would seem odd. If the namespace is 
http://www.w3.org/ns/openannotation/core/ then that's really where the 
files should be IMO.

Phil.

On 06/02/2013 10:58, Ivan Herman wrote:
>
> On Feb 6, 2013, at 11:41 , Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>> Yes, http://www.w3.org/ns/openannotation/core/ and
>> http://www.w3.org/ns/openannotation/core/* should not give a 404.. at
>> least now that we are in a way going to be calling for
>> implementations.
>>
>> Are we able to do a redirect to our RDFS/OWL (has it been updated?),
>> or do we hand it to W3C for publication?
>
> Technically, a redirection is possible I guess but, usually, it is preferred to have it stored locally (long term preservation and access, that sort of things...)
>
> On the other hand, the community group may also have its own publishing space at W3C; that is something that has to be settled with Ian Jacobs I believe.
>
> Ivan
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com> wrote:
>>> Congratulations on the new spec! The level of discussion and
>>> collaboration around openannoation has been really impressive.
>>>
>>> I apologize if this has come up before, but is there a plan to move
>>> the vocabulary over into the w3c namespace? I happened to have a
>>> conversation with Phil Archer at the w3c last week who (correct me if
>>> I'm wrong here Phil) indicated that this is a service that the w3c has
>>> been thinking about offering for community groups. The idea being that
>>> a vocabulary could have a persistent home at the w3c. Also, I think a
>>> w3c namespace for openannotation would lend the vocabulary some
>>> additional credibility outside the digital library domain.
>>>
>>> I thought I would ask now, as we can expect more openannotation
>>> implementations in the near future :-)
>>>
>>> //Ed
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> Firstly, thank you all so much for your hard work and engagement in
>>>> this process. We could not have gotten to this point without this
>>>> fantastic community. So it is with great pride that we announce the
>>>> publication of the next version of the Open Annotation specification:
>>>>
>>>>     http://www.openannotation.org/spec/core/
>>>>
>>>> This replaces the previous version of May 9th, 2012 and is (of course)
>>>> the version that we have been discussing at /spec/future/
>>>>
>>>> There may be minor typos left which were not caught. Please let us
>>>> know if you find any and we'll fix them, but any further changes to
>>>> the actual data model will have to wait to go through the next round
>>>> of feedback and revision.
>>>>
>>>> Many thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Rob and Paolo
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> Firstly, thank you all so much for your hard work and engagement in
>>>> this process. We could not have gotten to this point without this
>>>> fantastic community. So it is with great pride that we announce the
>>>> publication of the next version of the Open Annotation specification:
>>>>
>>>>     http://www.openannotation.org/spec/core/
>>>>
>>>> This replaces the previous version of May 9th, 2012 and is (of course)
>>>> the version that we have been discussing at /spec/future/
>>>>
>>>> There may be minor typos left which were not caught. Please let us
>>>> know if you find any and we'll fix them, but any further changes to
>>>> the actual data model will have to wait to go through the next round
>>>> of feedback and revision.
>>>>
>>>> Many thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Rob and Paolo
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
>> School of Computer Science
>> The University of Manchester
>>
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>
>
>
>
>

-- 

Phil Archer
W3C eGovernment

http://philarcher.org
+44 (0)7887 767755
@philarcher1
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2013 11:55:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:22:03 UTC