W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-openannotation@w3.org > February 2013

Re: New Draft comments: Appendices

From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 09:19:38 -0700
Message-ID: <CABevsUGBGVE26audbw2gM0deaiozUz+fOyxNq0Qn1=tk-zypuw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Cc: public-openannotation@w3.org
Fixed, that was my poor understanding of what counted for reconciliation.

Rob

On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote:
> Re-sending this one
>
>>
>> On
>> http://www.openannotation.org/spec/future/appendices.html
>> as of January 27. Only one comment!
>>
>> "The skos:related or skos:closeMatch relationship"
>> ->
>> "A <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/#mapping OR
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-primer/#secmapping">SKOS mapping</a> relationship
>> (skos:broaderMatch, skos:narrowMatch, skos:relatedMatch, skos:exactMatch or
>> skos:closeMatch)"
>> In retrospect, I don't think we should restrict the use of SKOS matching
>> properties for re-conciliating two motivation extensions with overlapping
>> scope. All of them could be useful.
>>
>
> The current draft has still "Other reconciliation relationships, such
> skos:related or skos:closeMatch". This should really be changed:
> - skos:relatedMatch is the reconciliation relationship, not skos:related
> - I believe it's quite important to mention skos:exactMatch.
>
> Antoine
>
Received on Monday, 4 February 2013 16:20:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:22:03 UTC