W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-openannotation@w3.org > February 2013

Re: Last Ultimate Final Call :)

From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 16:23:03 +0000
Message-ID: <CAPRnXtkxDj=vsBthmRe1SSsGoXwtV-_WPfkrvK1xStMENzC6jg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
Cc: public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>
This:


> It is important to be aware of the consequences of using a Fragment URI, and the restrictions that using them places on implementations.

Change to:

> It is important to be aware of the consequences of using a Fragment URI for the purpose of identifying parts of a resource, and the restrictions that using them places on implementations.


As you did not want to add a 'disclaimer' for Fragment URIs for
semantic tags. (which is the norm).



On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> wrote:
> To summarize the changes, before Monday's launch:
>
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Antoine:
>> * Homogeneity of JSON context names
> Done.
>
>> * Named / Embedded Graphs
> Rewritten and reordered as suggested.
>
>> * Lists and Containers
> Choice and Composite are subclasses of Alt and Bag, List is
> dual-classed with an extensive note describing the issues.
>
>> * Specific Resources with Style and Scope
> 3.1 rewritten to not include the diagram, and clarify that style and
> scope are included in the definition of the identity of the specific
> resource.
>
>> * Lack of consensus on Textual Bodies
> No change.
>
> Rob
>



-- 
Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
School of Computer Science
The University of Manchester
Received on Friday, 1 February 2013 16:23:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:22:03 UTC