W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-openannotation@w3.org > September 2012

Re: cnt:chars

From: Randall Leeds <randall.leeds@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 16:03:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAL6JQg8Rofosm5MWw6Z2PBuaTg4d8YeoiLM8QEg4G0BV27cdw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bob Morris <morris.bob@gmail.com>
Cc: public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Bob Morris <morris.bob@gmail.com> wrote:
> In http://www.w3.org/community/openannotation/wiki/Annotating_Resource-in-Context_Proposals
> many of the examples put cnt:chars on the Body, thereby making it a
> cnt:ContentAsText class by inference. (That's the domain of
> cnt:chars.)  Normally, I don't like domains and typing by inference
> via domains, but it seems pretty harmless here and is rather concise.
>
> Have we anywhere explicitly blessed using cnt at all? It seems like a
> good idea here, but I can't explain why I'm a little nervous.  Still,
> if we adopted it at least as a best practice, applications annotators
> can, of they choose always(?) be able to produce  something that a
> consuming application can present to humans without much advance
> understanding of the domain vocabulary of the Body details.

http://openannotation.org/spec/core/#Inline
Received on Friday, 7 September 2012 23:03:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 7 September 2012 23:03:56 GMT