W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-openannotation@w3.org > October 2012

Re: F2F Decision: Multiple Resources

From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 09:37:21 -0600
Message-ID: <CABevsUE5mHqjz8NEVGAPn09nbtOUpy5n4Lganu0awCAed0e6UQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Leyla Jael García Castro <leylajael@gmail.com>
Cc: Paolo Ciccarese <paolo.ciccarese@gmail.com>, Jacob Jett <jgjett@gmail.com>, public-openannotation@w3.org
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Leyla Jael García Castro
<leylajael@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> I don't see a problem with it, but should definitely be
>> oax:asIncludedIn, as it can be used for both Body and Target.
>> asAnnotatedIn would imply it could only be used for the target.
>
> @Rob. So, oax:asIncludedIn could be used for Body, Target, and Annotation as
> well? It is used on an Annotation in Paolo's example (oax:annotatedIn).
> Also in Paolo's example, what would be the difference between using
> oax:asIncludedIn on the _x Annotation or on the <choice1> Body? Because both
> would be possible, would not them?


You could have a resource acting as a body which, for the purposes of
the annotation, should be considered to be asIncludedIn another
resource.

Also, regarding previous examples, the asIncludedIn predicate as a
domain of SpecificResource, as otherwise it would not be specific to
the annotation.


So:

_x: a oa:Annotation ;
  oa:hasBody <SpecRes1> ;
  oa:hasTarget <target> .

<SpecRes1> a oa:SpecificResource ;
  oax:asIncludedIn <container-resource> ;
  oa:hasSource <body-resource> .

Thus, Jacob's case becomes slightly more complex:

_:x a oa:Annotation ;
  oa:hasBody <choice1> ;
  oa:hasTarget <ny-times-article> .

<choice1> a oa:Choice ;
  oa:default <comment-in-french> ;
  oa:item <comment-in-english> ;
  oa:item <comment-in-spanish> .


_:y a oa:Annotation ;
  oa:hasBody <body> ;
  oa:hasTarget <specificresource> .

<specificresource> a oa:SpecificResource ;
  oa:hasSource <comment-in-french> ;
  oax:asIncludedIn _:x .

(or should that be asIncludedIn <choice1> ? )


Hope that helps,

Rob
Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2012 15:37:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 30 October 2012 15:37:57 GMT