W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-openannotation@w3.org > November 2012

Re: F2F Decision: Sub-classing - Link vs Reference

From: Paolo Ciccarese <paolo.ciccarese@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 08:38:37 -0400
Message-ID: <CAFPX2kAT9=MJbtiJLzr7fGG3P2hF=sJeayTbzkSvd6RzSKLd6w@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-openannotation@w3.org
Jacob,
I just saw your email about Link vs. Reference
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-openannotation/2012Nov/0011.html

in the Domeo Annotation Tool we have a list of types we are using that need
to be translated to motivations. Two of such types are Citation and
Reference. The latter is the reference to another article that shows up at
the bottom of the paper. The first is the citation of the reference (for
instance the number of the reference within the textů like [3]).

I see those two types as specializations of Link if we want to have a
superclass (or a broader type in SKOS).

So if I had to translate that into motivations I would have:
- xx:Linking
   -- xx:Citing
   -- xx:Referencing

In our case we need to distinguish between citations and references.
However, I am not sure everybody needs that.

Paolo

-- 
Dr. Paolo Ciccarese
http://www.paolociccarese.info/
Biomedical Informatics Research & Development
Instructor of Neurology at Harvard Medical School
Assistant in Neuroscience at Mass General Hospital
+1-857-366-1524 (mobile)   +1-617-768-8744 (office)

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is intended only for the addressee(s),
may contain information that is considered
to be sensitive or confidential and may not be forwarded or disclosed to
any other party without the permission of the sender.
If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender
immediately.
Received on Friday, 2 November 2012 12:39:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 2 November 2012 12:39:09 GMT