Re: Migrating from Lemon to ontolex

Thanks John,

> On 10 Mar 2017, at 17:34, John McCrae <john@mccr.ae> wrote:
> 
> Hi Gilles,
> 
> There are plans to make LexInfo aware of OntoLex, so you don't need to update your URLs.
> 
> There is no problem with an entry being both a lemon:LexicalEntry and an ontolex:LexicalEntry, in fact this is probably even a good thing!

Yes, I'm using your code to take the correct decisions.

Regards,

Gilles,

> Regards,
> John
> 
> PS. BTW I implemented a converter a while back if you wish to try it: https://github.com/jmccrae/lemon-monnet2w3c <https://github.com/jmccrae/lemon-monnet2w3c>
> 
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Gilles Sérasset <Gilles.Serasset@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr <mailto:Gilles.Serasset@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr>> wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I was just trying to do a quick and (hopefully no so) dirty migration of DBnary from legacy Lemon model to the current version of Ontolex.
> 
> However, as I am extensively using the lexinfo ontology, I was wondering if I had to switch to an "ontolex aware" lexinfo. But when I looked at the currently available ontology on lexinfo.net <http://lexinfo.net/>, it only mentions the lemon prefix (http://lemon-model.net/lemon# <http://lemon-model.net/lemon#>) and no ontolex prefix (http://www.w3.org/ns/lemon/ontolex# <http://www.w3.org/ns/lemon/ontolex#>).
> 
> Is this normal, shouldn't it refer to the ontolex prefix to subclass the ontolex lexical entry class ?
> 
> In certain language I was stating :
> 
> :lexentry1 a lexinfo:Adverb
> 
> which implied 
> :lexentry1 a lemon:Word
> and
> :lexentry1 a lemon:LexicalEntry
> 
> How can I imply
> :lexentry1 a ontolex:Word ?
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> Gilles,
>