- From: Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
- Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 17:05:06 +0100
- To: Laurent Romary <laurent.romary@inria.fr>, Gerard de Melo <gdemelo@mpi-inf.mpg.de>
- Cc: public-ontolex@w3.org
Hi Laurent, sure, but the URIs need to be defined ;-) We do not want to invent new URIs for the language codes, but reuse existing ones. So my question was which lexvo or loc URIs to use. It seems that the answer is (thanks John): 1) use three letter code URIs for lexvo 2) use two letter code URIs for loc Right? I was mislead by the fact that http://www.lexvo.org/page/iso639-1/eng leads to a page that does not exist... Philipp. Am 05.11.15 um 10:58 schrieb Laurent Romary: > Dear all, > Would it make sense to follow the W3C recommendation for xml:lang, which is http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/bcp/bcp47.txt ? > (2 letters when they exist, 3 letters otherwise) > Bonne journée à tous, > Laurent > > >> Le 5 nov. 2015 à 10:49, Gerard de Melo <gdemelo@mpi-inf.mpg.de> a écrit : >> >> Hi Philipp, >> >> For Lexvo.org, you can either use 3-letter ISO 639-3 codes such as >> >> http://lexvo.org/id/iso639-3/eng >> >> or 2-letter ISO 639-1 codes such as >> >> http://lexvo.org/id/iso639-1/en >> >> Gerard >> >> >> On 2015-11-5 17:03, Philipp Cimiano wrote: >>> And one small thing: >>> >>> in many examples we use the dublin core terms property "language" to >>> express language information. >>> >>> Sometimes we use "eng" and "en" as language identifier (local name) with >>> respect to the LOC and LEXVO datasets. >>> >>> It seems to me that there are some mistakes here. >>> >>> It seems that LOC uses "eng" and LEXVO uses "en". >>> >>> For instance: >>> >>> http://www.lexvo.org/page/iso639-1/eng -> does not resolve property, while >>> >>> http://www.lexvo.org/page/iso639-1/en -> does resolve >>> >>> On the other hand: >>> >>> http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/iso639-2/en -> does not resolve, while >>> >>> http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/iso639-2/eng -> does resolve >>> >>> Thus, in all examples we should use: >>> >>> lexvo:en and loc:eng to indicate language information. >>> >>> A minor thing, but still... >>> >>> Greetings, >>> >>> Philipp. >>> >>> >>> >>> Am 05.11.15 um 09:38 schrieb Philipp Cimiano: >>>> Dear all, >>>> >>>> apologies for my silence in the last weeks. I have been distracted by >>>> many other things in October. Now I am working on the release of the >>>> ontolex spec with high priority. I have worked through all the >>>> normative sections of the specification. There are smaller issues that >>>> I will clarify with the main stakeholders of these modules directly. >>>> >>>> It is now time to have a final check of the spec if you want. >>>> >>>> I am confident that I will finish the thorough check of the model in >>>> the next few weeks. >>>> >>>> I will then give all the opportunity of doing a final check in the >>>> first two weeks of December. >>>> >>>> We will then release the specification of the model this year. >>>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>> >>>> Philipp. >>>> >>>> > Laurent Romary > INRIA > laurent.romary@inria.fr > > > > -- -- Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano AG Semantic Computing Exzellenzcluster für Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC) Universität Bielefeld Tel: +49 521 106 12249 Fax: +49 521 106 6560 Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de Office CITEC-2.307 Universitätsstr. 21-25 33615 Bielefeld, NRW Germany
Received on Thursday, 5 November 2015 16:05:37 UTC