- From: Paul Buitelaar <paul.buitelaar@deri.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 17:25:01 +0100
- To: <public-ontolex@w3.org>
yes, strongly agreed On 12/06/2014 13:44, Dave Lewis wrote: > If we wish to address use cases involving terminology management then > support for multiword expressions is important as these are very common > in term bases. > > Regards, > Dave > > On 06/06/2014 16:44, Paul Buitelaar wrote: >> thanks for the infos John >> >> on: Monnet /lemon/ allows us to say if a lexical entry is a multi-word >> expression, affix or word. >> >> there are strong use cases for MWEs, e.g. in the way we use lemon in >> EuroSentiment for the definition of complex sentiment expressions such >> as 'quite good', 'bit dirty' >> >> not sure on affixes >> >> word is obvious >> >> cheers >> >> >> Paul >> >> >> On 06/06/2014 16:25, John P. McCrae wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Due to the large number of resources using the previous Monnet /lemon >>> /vocabulary it seems natural that we should support users who wish to >>> transition to the W3C OntoLex /lemon /vocabulary. As such I was looking >>> into the conversion. >>> >>> https://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Monnet_OntoLex_Compatibility >>> >>> There are some areas where the previous model has significant >>> differences that we should consider whether to adopt. (Of course I do >>> not assume that everything in Monnet Lemon should be transferred across >>> but we should attempt to be able to represent relevant use cases already >>> addressed by Monnet Lemon). >>> >>> From my analysis, there are two main issues that we should still >>> address >>> >>> * Monnet /lemon/ has more sophisticated description of senses, in >>> particular, mechanisms such as contexts >>> <http://lemon-model.net/lemon-cookbook/node11.html>, conditions >>> <http://lemon-model.net/lemon-cookbook/node30.html>, definitions, >>> examples and incompatibility >>> <http://lemon-model.net/lemon-cookbook/node14.html> >>> * Monnet /lemon/ allows us to say if a lexical entry is a multi-word >>> expression, affix or word. >>> >>> Any comments on whether we should allow this modelling >>> >>> Regards, >>> John >> >> > >
Received on Thursday, 12 June 2014 16:26:48 UTC