- From: Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
- Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 13:28:24 +0200
- To: Jorge Gracia <jgracia@fi.upm.es>
- CC: "public-ontolex@w3.org" <public-ontolex@w3.org>
Thanks for the feedback so far. lemon-w3c as proposed by Aldo could also be a good option actually. Regards, Philipp. Am 10.09.13 13:22, schrieb Jorge Gracia: > Dear Philipp, > > As for me, lemon2 sounds like a good compromise solution. > > Regards, > Jorge > > 2013/9/9 Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>: >> Dear all, >> >> on the telco last Friday, we went through and discussed the votes on the 8 >> questions. I will summarize our interpretation of the votes and make a >> proposal on how to proceed in a separate email. >> >> Before I do that, I would like to share with you some thoughts on question 7 >> related to whether the model should be called ontolex or lemon. >> >> This is the only question where there are clearly two subgroups of people >> voting on different names. While I have been involved in the design of >> lemon, I have voted for calling the model "ontolex" as I find it important >> that we acknowledge that the new model we are developing is a new model that >> is based on a larger consensus compared to the lemon model. >> >> And while in principle names do not matter, I think we should take into >> account that many people have started to use the lemon model already with >> the result that the lemon model has gained some momentum and popularity. >> Taking this into consideration, I think it would be detrimental to loose >> these people and coming up with a new model with a completely new name might >> indeed confuse people and be also detrimental in the adoption of our model. >> >> So as a compromise between both groups, I would like to throw a third >> proposal in. What about calling the new model to be developed "lemon2"? >> >> In this way, we would buy in all those people that have started already to >> use lemon model as potential adopters of our new model. At the same time, we >> would make clear that this is a new model that extends the previous model in >> a number of respects. We would also follow a prominent example with the >> extension of the Web Ontology language OWL being named OWL2. >> >> At the same time, using the name lemon2 would be a clear sign to the early >> adopters of the lemon model that they can continue along the same path and >> do not need to start anew. >> >> I would like to understand if this is a viable option before we make a final >> decision on the model's name. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Philipp. >> >> -- >> >> Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano >> >> Phone: +49 521 106 12249 >> Fax: +49 521 106 12412 >> Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de >> >> Forschungsbau Intelligente Systeme (FBIIS) >> Raum 2.307 >> Universität Bielefeld >> Inspiration 1 >> 33619 Bielefeld > > -- Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano Phone: +49 521 106 12249 Fax: +49 521 106 12412 Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de Forschungsbau Intelligente Systeme (FBIIS) Raum 2.307 Universität Bielefeld Inspiration 1 33619 Bielefeld
Received on Tuesday, 10 September 2013 11:28:47 UTC