Hi John, a small comment on the Morphology you state: The modelling should be able to handle compound words without redundancy e.g., The morphology of "widersprechen" is the same as "sprechen" this should probably be: The inflection of "widersprechen" is the same as "sprechen" (the morphology includes inflection and decomposition into two morphemes: 'wider' and 'sprechen') Paul On 18/01/2013 12:16, John McCrae wrote: > Hi all, > > I have written up initial versions of the requirement for publishing > language resources as linked data, and for modelling morphology. Does > anyone have any comments? > > http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Specification_of_Requirements/Linked_Data > http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Specification_of_Requirements/Morphology > > Regards, > John McCraeReceived on Friday, 18 January 2013 13:42:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 18 January 2013 13:42:21 GMT