W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ontolex@w3.org > February 2013

Re: Next Ontolex Meeting, tomorrow, Feb 22, 12:00

From: Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:23:24 +0100
Message-ID: <512611BC.90901@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
To: Armando Stellato <stellato@info.uniroma2.it>
CC: 'Guadalupe Aguado' <gac280771@gmail.com>, public-ontolex@w3.org
Dear Armando,

ok, thanks for letting us know.

Concerning SKOS-XL: yes, we should check whether we can align to it 
somehow.
On the subclassing idea: this would mean that for instance lemon:Sense 
would be a subclass of skos:Concept and lemon:LexicalEntry a subclass of 
skosxl:Label?

I do not see really other alternatives really. We have to think about 
whether this is what we want?

In general: are there any arguments why we should consider aligning to 
SKOS / SKOS-XL?

Philipp.

Am 21.02.13 12:25, schrieb Armando Stellato:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I'm sorry I cannot attend too. The one-week shift collided with 
> student exams I set in advance for that date.
>
> However, in the previous days I added more info on:
>
> http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Specification_of_Requirements/Metadata#Metadata_about_RDF_Linguistic_Resources
>
> and defined two sets of metadata (one for Lexical Nets, and one for 
> ontologies enriched with linguistic info). Plus, I reported on my 
> thoughts (and discussions with other people) regarding the subjects of 
> these metadata. More to come in the following days.
>
> Finally, getting back to a previous msg from Aldo about 
> http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Specification_of_Requirements/Linked_Data, 
> and his observations about SKOS. I think it is important to understand 
> if and how SKOS (and SKOS-XL) may be reused in this modeling.
>
> SKOS concepts may provide the conceptual backbone of lexical resources 
> (e.g. synsets in wordnet), while reified labels coming from SKOS-XL 
> may allow for the specification of lexical relationships. Thus, while 
> sitting on top of the SKOS-XL skeleton, this could be only a:
>
> 1)Subclassingwork: e.g. define Senses, Lexical Entry etc... as 
> specific subclasses of SKOS(XL) elements.
>
> 2)Instantiation: e.g. A vocabulary of reusable, shareable, lexical 
> relationships.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Armando
>
> *From:*Guadalupe Aguado [mailto:gac280771@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* giovedý 21 febbraio 2013 09.30
> *To:* Philipp Cimiano
> *Cc:* public-ontolex@w3.org
> *Subject:* Re: Next Ontolex Meeting, tomorrow, Feb 22, 12:00
>
> Dear Philipp
>
> I'm afraid I won't be able to attend the meeting, as I'll be in a 
> doctoral thesis board.
>
> Elena will attend the meeting.
>
> Best regards
>
> Lupe
>
> 2013/2/21 Philipp Cimiano 
> <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de<mailto:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>>
>
>     Dear all,
>
>      this is to inform you that tomorrow we will have our regular
>     ontolex teleconference.
>
>     We will continue our discussion of particular examples, in
>     particular looking at the contributions here:
>
>     http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Specification_of_Requirements/Lexicon-Ontology-Mapping
>
>     http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Specification_of_Requirements_on_Terminological_Analysis
>
>     http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Specification_of_Requirements/Properties-and-Relations-of-Entries
>
>     Paul/Mihael: I do not see any RDF examples in the wiki yet, will
>     you manage to work them out until tomorrow?
>
>     Elena/Lupe: same for you, I do not see any RDF examples in the
>     wiki yet
>
>     John: you wanted to work out how to represent Lexical Nets* in
>     lemon, with WordNet as an example; can you please provide some RDF
>     code for this?
>
>     >>From then on, I would discuss how to i) model lexico-syntactic
>     patterns (Dagmar: are you going to be there?) and ii) how to link
>     entries across resources. We could start with Framenet / Verbnet
>     for example, then showing how they can be used within a lemon
>     lexical entry. Linking to wiktionary could be also considered as
>     well as to ISOCAT.
>
>     Another issue will be to look at modelling terminological
>     resources in the lexicon-ontology model.
>
>     Thanks to everybody. We have to get concrete and produce some
>     (draft of a) spec this year ;-)
>
>     Philipp.
>
>     -- 
>     Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
>     Semantic Computing Group
>     Excellence Cluster - Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
>     University of Bielefeld
>
>     Phone: +49 521 106 12249<tel:%2B49%20521%20106%2012249>
>     Fax: +49 521 106 12412<tel:%2B49%20521%20106%2012412>
>     Mail:
>     cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de<mailto:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
>
>     Room H-127
>     Morgenbreede 39
>     33615 Bielefeld
>


-- 
Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
Semantic Computing Group
Excellence Cluster - Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
University of Bielefeld

Phone: +49 521 106 12249
Fax: +49 521 106 12412
Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de

Room H-127
Morgenbreede 39
33615 Bielefeld
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2013 12:23:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 21 February 2013 12:23:59 GMT