W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ontolex@w3.org > February 2013

RE: next telco and todos

From: Armando Stellato <stellato@info.uniroma2.it>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 17:20:05 +0100
To: "'Aldo Gangemi'" <aldo.gangemi@gmail.com>
Cc: "'Aldo Gangemi'" <aldo.gangemi@cnr.it>, "'Philipp Cimiano'" <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>, <public-ontolex@w3.org>
Message-ID: <001a01ce022a$555f3d30$001db790$@info.uniroma2.it>
> Hi Armando, I think any contribution from within the community group is
> welcome :)

Thx Aldo, will go over it on Friday or early next week at the most!

 
> On Feb 2, 2013, at 2:31:16 PM , "Armando Stellato"
> <stellato@info.uniroma2.it> wrote:
> 
> > Dear all,
> >
> >> Anyway, I had previously updated the requirements for lexical
> >> resources,
> > so
> >> John, if you want to discuss my updates let's do it on the list.
> >> As I said last time, we shouldn't concentrate in representing WordNet
> >> or
> > any
> >> other specific resource: fo rmany of them, work has been done and we
> >> do
> > not
> >> need to redo it again.
> >> However, we need to abstract from the requirements coming those
> >> resources in order to make them as interoperable as possible without
> >> unnecessary complexity.
> >> Aldo
> >
> > May I contribute to that req or the wiki is intended for the main
> > investigators of each requirement section? (maybe in the section
> > discussion of the page?). I had some ideas about interoperability, in
the spirit
> of:
> > http://art.uniroma2.it/software/LinguisticWatermark/images/LinguisticW
> > aterma
> > rk-id.gif
> >
> http://art.uniroma2.it/publications/docs/2008_SWAP2008_LinguisticWater
> mark3.
> > 0.pdf
> >
> > surely they can be modeled better (supporting linguistic
> > interoperability in software tools was the aim there, and no a
> > rigorous lexical model), but I think that is the thing Aldo is hinting
to, too.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Armando
> >
> > P.S. In any case I'll be off for 3 days due to a project final
> > meeting, but can go over it on Friday or the following week
> >
> >
Received on Sunday, 3 February 2013 16:18:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 3 February 2013 16:18:56 GMT