RE: Linking to SKOS

Dear Philipp,

I added a few comments. Need to refine it further, but it's a start...

Cheers,

Armando

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Philipp Cimiano [mailto:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de]
> Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2013 9:26 PM
> To: public-ontolex@w3.org
> Subject: Linking to SKOS
> 
> Dear all,
> 
>   for all those that will be available tomorrow at our regular telco (I
know that
> it is public holiday in Spain), I have prepared a short document in which
I
> summarize the two alternatives for mapping the ontolex vocabulary to SKOS
> that we have been discussing in the last two weeks.
> 
> http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Linking_to_SKOS
> 
> Feel free to comment or extend.
> 
> Armando: I think you could extend this with your arguments *for* the
> proposal to see ontolex:LexicalEntry as a subclass of skosxl:Label?
> 
> I look forward to discuss with you tomorrow!
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Philipp.
> 
> Access details for the telco tomorrow can be found here:
> http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Teleconference,_2013.06.12,_
> 15-16_pm_CET
> 
> --
> 
> Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
> 
> Phone: +49 521 106 12249
> Fax: +49 521 106 12412
> Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
> 
> Forschungsbau Intelligente Systeme (FBIIS) Raum 2.307 Universität
Bielefeld
> Inspiration 1
> 33619 Bielefeld

Received on Friday, 13 December 2013 12:09:48 UTC