W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-oilgaschem@w3.org > December 2011

Re: Request Re Editing Charter

From: Roger Cutler <rogercutler@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 17:03:00 -0600
Message-ID: <CAMU31A7COcEur4ggo4R8K=jtxNMRMpq-1WBBvs2iO2DY24hcwg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Cc: public-oilgaschem@w3.org
Right.  I've been putting some more stuff in, including a section in which
I say, "@@@ ... I have no idea ...@@@.  In other words, I started a
sentence and I had no idea what the answer was.  You might want to look at
that one, Ian.

On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:

>
> On 6 Dec 2011, at 4:26 PM, Roger Cutler wrote:
>
> > I'm not clear what your initial comment about the history is intended
> for.  Do you want it explicitly referenced in the charter?  Or are you just
> pointing it out to me?  I know it's there, but to be honest I find it
> difficult to navigate the links in the history and understand what I'm
> seeing.  No doubt my skills will improve.
>
> I was pointing it out to you and others. You mentioned history in your
> email but (1) it was further down and (2) no URI. So I wanted to give the
> URI for all to check it out.
>
> I agree that reading diffs is not always fun and so it's friendly to
> summarize changes.
>
> Ian
>
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 6 Dec 2011, at 2:59 PM, Roger Cutler wrote:
> >
> > > Just to help me keep track of what's going on and to avoid getting
> into an unintentional do-undo back and forth -- if you edit the draft
> charter could you please email me and give me a hint what you did?
> >
> > Hi Roger,
> >
> > I want to point out up top (you mention it below) the editing history:
> >
> http://www.w3.org/community/oilgaschem/wiki/index.php?title=Oil,_Gas_and_Chemicals_Business_Group_Charter&action=history
> >
> > > Ian -- I think that you took out the voting and patent sections
> because there are no requirements, right?
> >
> > Right:
> >
> > 1) The proc doc voting requirements don't apply to BGs.
> > 2) The patent requirements are covered by the CLA and FSA; you could
> link to them but I thought it was unnecessary.
> >
> > > It does seem to me, however, that it might be a good idea to discuss
> the IP framework for Community and Business Groups anyway, as an
> informational thing.
> >
> > No problem with that.
> >
> > > I have in mind pointing to the IP page for Community groups and
> perhaps including some "user friendly" approximate discussion along the
> lines that you once sent me.  Sound OK?
> >
> > I would avoid paraphrasing the policy. You could just say something
> vanilla like "Contributions are made under Community and Business Group
> agreements" with a link to the agreements.
> >
> > [Meanwhile, I am working on a summary of the policy (not yet ready).]
> >
> > Ian
> >
> > >
> > > Jennifer -- I find the history tracking of the Wiki confusing and I
> can't figure out what you did.  Not much, as far as I can tell -- unless I
> am confusing what you did with what Ian did.  Did you sort of complete what
> he started?
> > >
> > > I am not trying to discourage anyone from adding content or modifying.
> >
> > --
> > Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)    http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
> > Tel:                                      +1 718 260 9447
> >
> >
>
> --
> Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)    http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
> Tel:                                      +1 718 260 9447
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 6 December 2011 23:03:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 6 December 2011 23:03:39 GMT